b0ner
Casual Gamer
 
Posts: 160
|
Post by b0ner on Nov 1, 2006 15:16:38 GMT -5
yes you to make good points. I agree with adamskafan's feeling about HALO CE, as well as Chain Smoker's post.
|
|
|
Post by AoD on Nov 1, 2006 15:41:41 GMT -5
Yeah, you really don't need an aiming reticule. It's really for n00by like players. I only use it for precision in glitches anyways. Whenever I aim at an enemy, the crosshairs just aim right at their head. Unless they take me off guard, like when I'm taking a dump or eating chips.
|
|
b0ner
Casual Gamer
 
Posts: 160
|
Post by b0ner on Nov 1, 2006 15:50:54 GMT -5
yes that's the only time they kill you but you still manage to kill them most of the time
|
|
|
Post by AoD on Nov 1, 2006 16:01:20 GMT -5
So, long story short, I don't take dumps or eat chips very often.
|
|
|
Post by adamskafan on Nov 1, 2006 16:25:11 GMT -5
Chain Smoker - Everytime I play Halo, there's a reticle EVERYWHERE...
STALKER.
|
|
|
Post by Chain Smoker on Nov 1, 2006 17:37:02 GMT -5
But, but I...
What can I say, I like to watch.
|
|
b0ner
Casual Gamer
 
Posts: 160
|
Post by b0ner on Nov 1, 2006 19:10:56 GMT -5
Hmmmmm very intriging
|
|
|
Post by adamskafan on Nov 7, 2006 19:35:02 GMT -5
Indeed.
|
|
b0ner
Casual Gamer
 
Posts: 160
|
Post by b0ner on Nov 9, 2006 20:14:41 GMT -5
yes yes still intriging
|
|
|
Post by Red on Nov 15, 2006 20:21:26 GMT -5
FUCk ME SIDEWAYS!
There was just like six posts of "Indeed" and "Intrigueing." Post whores.
|
|